M/S M.B. Rice And General Mills v. Union Of India And Others
Vinod Kumar 2016.10.06 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CWP No.20885 of 2016 Date of decision:04.10.2016 M/s M.B. Rice & General Mills
...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present:
Mr. Daman Dhir, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral) After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and examining the available record, I am of the considered opinion that in view of Clause 19 of the Scheme and Clause 27 of the agreement, the petitioner has the remedy of arbitration.
In view thereof, the petitioner is relegated to its remedy of arbitration.
Disposed of.
October 04, 2016 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge Whether speaking / reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable:
Yes/No