Rajeev Singh v. State Of Haryana And ORS

CWP-15627-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15627-2018 Date of decision : 21.06.2018 Rajeev Singh

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ... Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) As per the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the premises, subject matter of the mortgage, are in possession of the tenants by virtue of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, as applicable to State of Haryana, but no document of tenancy has been proved on record. If at all, the premises are with the tenants, the tenants have an independent remedy to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 (4-A) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act.).

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail Yogesh Sharma 2018.06.21 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-15627-2018 alternative remedy in accordance with law.

Ordered accordingly.

( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE ( AVNEESH JHINGAN ) JUDGE 21.06.2018 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No Yogesh Sharma 2018.06.21 15:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document