Amar Singh v. Mukesh Kumar Bansal And Another



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP No.2529 of 2019 Date of Decision: 11.12.2019 Amar Singh Petitioner

Versus

Mukesh Kumar Bansal, Chief Engineer/Operation, PSPCL Bathinda and another Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Ashish Goklaney, Advocate for Mr. P.K. Goklaney, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pulkit, Advocate for the respondents.

**** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

The contempt petition is filed pleading wilful disobedience of order dated 29.11.2018 passed by this Court in CWP No.8848 of 2017. Reply by way of affidavit of Er. Harish Kumar, Additional Superintending Engineer, Operation Division, PSPCL, Gidderbaha, same is taken on record, copy handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of reply filed, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause of action survives for pursuing the contempt petition, however, seeks liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. The contempt petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE December 11, 2019
    

  

   
    

    PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.12.12 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh