Gurdev Singh v. Mukesh Kumar Bansal And Another



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP No.2536 of 2019 Date of Decision: 11.12.2019 Gurdev Singh Petitioner

Versus

Mukesh Kumar Bansal, Chief Engineer/ Operation, PSPCL, Bathinda and another Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Ashish Goklaney, Advocate for Mr. P.K. Goklaney, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Shantanu Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the respondents.

**** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

Learned counsel for the respondents has produced revised pension pay order and revised gratuity pay order, both dated 05.09.2019, same are taken on record, copies handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of documents produced, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause of action survives for pursuing the contempt petition, however, seeks liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law for redressal of surviving grievance, if any. The contempt petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.

[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE December 11, 2019
    

      
  



    PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.12.12 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh