Neelam Mangal And ANR v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.21956 of 2015 Date of decision: 14.10.2015 Smt. Neelam Mangal and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Present: - Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate, for Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL) Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and after perusing the paper-book, however, without commenting on merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of, without issuing notice to the respondents, with a direction to respondent No.2 - Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambala, to look into the grievance of the petitioners specifically made in representation dated 12.05.2015 (Annexure P-9) and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

(Paramjeet Singh) October 14, 2015 Judge R.S.

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.10.15 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

RAVINDER SINGH 2015.10.15 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document