← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/39525/2021disposed of

Sarabjit Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others

2021-09-23Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-39525-2021 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39525-2021 Date of Decision: September 23, 2021 Sarabjit Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

Present:

Mr.R.S.Bains,Sr.Advocate with Mr.Vivek Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

........

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for issuance of direction to submit the final report 173 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.0027, dated 04.03.2020, under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Women, Jalandhar. Learned senior counsel submits that FIR in this case was registered on 04.03.2020, however, the investigation is not complete till date.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr.Harpreet Singh Multani, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and at the outset submits that investigation in this case is complete and challan has already been presented on 02.09.2021 qua mother-in-law Jasbir Kaur. He submits that so far as husband-Pushpinder Singh is concerned, he is abroad, hence, challan could not be presented against him. However, he submits, on instructions from SI Surinder Kaur, that notice under Section 105 Cr.P.C. has already been issued to the husband and the proceedings MEENU 2021.09.23 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-39525-2021 -2would be taken to its logical end soon.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, nothing survives in the present petition, which is disposed of accordingly. September 23, 2021 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No MEENU 2021.09.23 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh