Munia Devi And ORS. v. Suresh Kumar And ORS.

223 IN THE E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB B AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2084-2 Date of Deci VI AND ORS.

ision: 01.12.2025 ...Appellants MUNIA DEV

Versus

UMAR AND ORS.

...Respondents

SURESH KU CORAM: H HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKR RAM AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellants.

None for respondent No.3-Insur AGGARWAL, J.(Oral) rance Company.

VIKRAM A 1.

As per the report of the Re egistry, notice issued to respondent N No.1 has been received back wi ith the report that he has expired.

2.

Notice issued to respondent No o.2 was not received back served or oth herwise.

3.

On the last date of hearing a also, nobody had put in appearance o on behalf of the appellants. It ap ppears that the appellants are no longer r interested in pursuing the appea al.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

(V VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE 01.12.2025 himanshu Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.12.03 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document