Pinki And Anothers v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr.No.201 CRM-M No.30339 of 2019 Date of Decision: 07.03.2022 Pinki and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Karanbir Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.

* * * * MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL) Both the petitioners herein have sought the relief of anticipatory bail in the criminal case arising out of the FIR bearing No.0036 dated 24.04.2019 registered at Police Station Division No.1, District Pathankot, under Section 306 IPC.

Learned State counsel, on the instructions from ASI Balkar Singh from the above-said Police Station, apprises the Court that in compliance of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench on 18.07.2019, both the petitioners have joined in the investigation and their custodial interrogation is not required and they are also not involved in any other criminal case of the similar nature and moreover, the Challan has already been presented before the competent Court and the trial has commenced in the case.

In view of the above-discussed submission as made by NEETU RANI 2022.03.07 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC

CRM-M No.30339 of 2019 -2- .....

learned State counsel, the instant petition is allowed and the relief of interim bail, as extended to the petitioners named Pinki and Anita Devi @ Sunita by the Co-ordinate Bench vide the said order dated 18.07.2019, is hereby made absolute.

However, the petitioners shall strictly abide by all the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) 07.03.2022 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2022.03.07 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC