Jallo Devi v. State Of Haryana And ORS.



 





IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No. 

 



Date of Decision : 27.04.2015 Jallo Devi ...... Petitioner versus State of Haryana & others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present :

Mr.Y.P.Khullar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Shruti Goyal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for respondent No.3.

***

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL) It is not disputed that pursuant to the order dated 27.03.2015 and 28.04.2014, the services of the petitioner have been regularized w.e.f. 18.10.1996 in the pay scale of Rs.2550-3200. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of this order this writ petition has been rendered infructuous but some time be fixed within which the respondents would now give the consequential benefits.

POOJA SHARMA 2015.04.29 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh



 




Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 prays for three months time to grant consequential benefits to the petitioner. The prayer is allowed.

In the circumstances this writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous with a further direction to respondent No.3 to grant the consequential benefits within 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order as prayed for. Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of. ( AJAY TEWARI ) 27.04.2015 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I POOJA SHARMA 2015.04.29 13:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh