Hindu Shiksha Samiti Kuk v. P.O. Industrial Tribunal And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.22978 of 2014 Date of decision: 08.07.2015 Hindu Shiksha Samiti Kurukshetra ... Petitioner Vs.

The Presiding Officer and another ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1.

Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Present:- Mr. R.S.Longia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Singal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) For orders see, detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in CWP No.23780 of 2013 titled as Anand Kumar vs. The Presiding Officer and others.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE July 08, 2015 savita SAVITA DEVI KADIAN 2015.07.09 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh