Nirmal v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd And ORS

SANJEEV KUMAR 2015.01.15 12:38

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.23001 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision.12.01.2015 Smt. Nirmal widow of Sh. Om Parkash .......Petitioner

Versus

UHBVNL and others ......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? -.- K. KANNAN J. (ORAL) 1.

There is no ground for a challenge before this Court for a notice of theft issued to the petitioner. The petitioner is entitled under the relevant Regulation 37.2(c) to make a representation within 15 days of the assessment before the authority and the designated authority after giving the consumer an opportunity of being heard, pass a final order within 7 days of such a representation. The representation is reported to have been made on 04.10.2014. If no order is passed, the petitioner may join issues with the respondent and elicit a final order to be passed in the manner contemplated under Regulation 37.2. 2.

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (K. KANNAN) JUDGE January 12, 2015 Pankaj*