Mohd. Mehraj v. State Of Haryana
CRM-M-28865-2026 -1-
!" #$%$ &' ( )*
' +, -. --
! "
### - */ ,0' $
"
%&' (
) * + +
','- . /()01
+ **
*23)454 45,-','6*
4'- 4'7.'1 4%,.-1(
)
','-. /()01 "
""
2 ' $
238 * 8
"
"
9 ""* * " "
9 " *8
"
+ ""* * "
+ * :
"8
8 * "
CRM-M-28865-2026 -2- "
* "
""45,-','6 +
- *
23
*
* 8
$
+ ;
4&- (
) * + +
','-. /()01 .8 8
46% < <1 8
* ,=,%','6
88 * 8 + 8
> + * * " + "
+
8 8
" " ,7,%','6 8 8 + " :
8 *
"
* ?
"
" * 2 8 8
4-,5','6 % * " "
"" "
8 233
23 "* " 23 ) %,, 4&,6','5 * * * ?" 8 8 " "
$ * "
?
?" 8
CRM-M-28865-2026 -3- " ""
8
$23 "* * * " ""
*
@
*
$
* * ?
" 5 )
6 A
"
*
3
""*
*
$
" "" ""*
*
" * 2
* *
*
*
$ * $
" + > >
"
*
"$
*
""8 7 $ <
" " "
""* & $
""*
>
*
+ *
B8*" $ ""*
* For conducting proper and through investigation in the matter, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is must. Even otherwise, the petitioner has failed to make out
CRM-M-28865-2026 -4any exceptional or extraordinary circumstance making out a case for grant of pre-arrest bail to him. It is well settled that anticipatory bail to an accused can be granted in exceptional circumstances only as a person couched in comparative safety of pre-arrest bail would certainly not disclose all the facts within his knowledge. In case custodial interrogation of the petitioner is denied to the Investigating Agency, that shall leave many glaring loopholes and gaps, thereby adversely affecting the investigation. In view of the above discussed facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant concession of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
9.
It is made clear that the observations made hereinabove are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition and the same shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 10.
" "
1- 2 ( )*