Arshdeep Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others




   

      

   





CWP-15396-2023



  
 

 



   

!

State of Punjab and Others




"



       



 

   


#$
"

 % &
'



 


   
( !


) 
!
*!

&
*
!% + 





 !

1.
(
  
',
-

  
 
+


, 
! 
 , 
./0



)   !

 

1
 
!




-




!

2  2!   

 

  

,, -


   

% 

, 3











 !,
 ,  
'
2
4 5//56/5 2.
Learned counsel would contend that the candidature of the petitioner has been rejected primarily on the ground of lodging of FIR, wherein the police had declared him innocent and the cancellation report stands presented. He places reliance on the judgments passed in the cases of Pardeep vs. State of Haryana and Others, (2014) 2 SLR 610, Anil Thakur vs. State of H.P., (2015) 1 HimLR 542, Ramesh Bishnoi vs. Union of India, (2018) WLN 273, Ankur Sangwan vs. Union of India and Others, (2016) 4 AD (Delhi) 161, Pritam vs. State of Bihar, (2018) 4 PLJR 572 and Joginder Singh vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh, (2015) 2 SCC 377. He thus, at this stage, on instructions, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, a direction is given to the State to decide and consider the claim of the petitioner, in terms of the aforesaid judgments MOHIT 2024.04.09 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-15396-2023 !

"
"

in a time bound manner by granting him an opportunity of hearing. 3.
Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 4
1
' -


   

-  !

  
!



2  



  &


  

  +7


 

- 

   

 

  

  

 

, 2



   

3




%!      

+ '


,

,


  &
- 

 


2  


 !

  , &
   7
+   
+
 





   
  - 
8 - '

&



'

 !

, 7


 , 
+ 
  &



3
 
+

 &



 



2
  - 



!

 # 

 # 2

9

 


3 /

  

:



/

4 9

 




+,

:



/

4 MOHIT 2024.04.09 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment