Mubin v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29834 of 2025 DATE OF DECISION :- 19.06.2025 Mubin

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present:- Mr. Gulshan Nandwani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, DAG, Haryana.

*** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J.

(ORAL) 1.

The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in FIR No.116 dated 09.04.2024 under Sections 379/411 IPC, registered at Police Station Kasola, District Rewari.

2.

Learned counsel representing the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner is sought to be implicated on the basis of disclosure statement made by co-accused Munfaid and Fareed, admissibility whereof is doubtful. 3.

Per contra, learned State counsel has submitted that there are 16 other criminal cases pending against the petitioner with similar acquisitions. 4.

Keeping in view the aforesaid circumstances, there is no ground to grant the concession of pre-arrest bail.

5.

Hence, the petition stands dismissed.

(ANIL KSHETARPAL ) JUDGE 19.06.2025 P.Singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2025.06.19 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment