Marshalino Norona Alias Marcelino Noronha v. Tejinder Mohan Singh Liberhan And Others

CR No. 3300 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CR-3300-2025 (O&M) Decided on: 29.05.2025 Marshalino Norona @ Marcelino Noronha ......Petitioner

Versus

Tejinder Mohan Singh Liberhan & Ors.

......Respondents CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Vishal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

In compliance of the order dated 28.05.2025, counsel for the respondent has placed on record copy of report of Bailiff, as per which the possession of the demised premises has already been handed over to decree-holder/ respondent herein.

2.

In the petition filed by landlords Tejinder Mohan Singh & Sanjeev Mohan Singh (respondents No.1 and 2 herein) under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, ejectment of the tenants Ursula (proforma respondent herein) and Marshalino Norona (petitioner herein) was ordered by the learned Rent Controller on 25.01.2024 on the ground of non-payment of rent; the tenants having ceased to occupy the demised premises; the premises having become unsafe and unfit for human habitation, lying in dilapidated condition and the bonafide necessity of the landlords.

3.

The appeal filed against the aforesaid order of ejectment is pending before the learned Appellate Authority. An application was moved before the Appellate Authority for staying the operation of the ejectment order passed by the Rent Controller. However, Learned Appellate Authority by way of the impugned order dated 22.05.2025 declined the said request after observing that, as per own evidence of the tenants, the demised JITEN SHARMA 2025.05.31 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Page N: 1 of 2 Pages

CR No. 3300 of 2025 premises were lying in dilapidated condition and that nobody was residing therein and that tenants had not even paid the rent. 4.

Against the aforesaid order dated 22.05.2025, the present revision petition was filed.

5.

However, the landlords had filed execution, wherein the warrants of possession were issued. Learned counsel for landlords i.e. respondents herein has placed on record the copy of the report of Bailiff, which indicates that possession of demised premises has already been handed over to landlords i.e. respondents herein on 26.05.2025. 6.

In view of the above, the present petition is hereby disposed of having been rendered infructuous.

(DEEPAK GUPTA) 29.05.2025 JUDGE Jiten Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JITEN SHARMA 2025.05.31 11:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Page N: 2 of 2 Pages