Balkar Singh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 216(1) CRM-M-34252-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.08.2022 BALKAR SINGH ......... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA ......... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Rajeev Sharma (Raju), Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajat Gautam, D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Govind Chouhan, Advocate for the complainant. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 15 lac but due to his precarious financial condition he could only deposit Rs. 7.5 lac. He further submits that he has filed CRM-27590-2021 wherein he has undertaken to sell his land and make good the deficiency. Be that as it may, learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage makes a further statement that in case this Court grants bail to the petitioner then he shall not encumbrance, alienate, transfer or create any lien over the aforesaid land till the pendency of the criminal trial.

Learned counsel for the complainant has strenuously and vehemently opposed the bail.

Given such statement, interim order dated 03.11.2020 made absolute. It is clarified that the petitioner shall not encumbrance, alienate, transfer or create any lien over the aforesaid land till the pendency of the criminal trial on land measuring 8 kanal out of total 11 kitte of Khewat No. 297 total measuring 83 kanals 2 marlas situated in village Gagsina, Tehsil Gharaunda, District Karnal owned and possessed by the petitioner.

Petition allowed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 09.08.2022 Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2022.08.10 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document