← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/32723/2024disposed of

Jangir Singh v. State Of Punjab And ANR

2024-10-22Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara2 pages

CRM-M No. 32723 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 32723 of 2024 Date of Decision: 22.10.2024 Jangir Singh ...PeƟƟoner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Kanav Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Pardhuman Garg, Advocate for the peƟƟoner.

Ms. SwaƟ Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police StaƟon SecƟons 25.01.2024 Bareta, District Mansa 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120-B IPC 1.

Seeking quashing of the FIR capƟoned above, the peƟƟoner has come up before this Court under SecƟon 482 CrPC.

2.

Counsel for the peƟƟoner submits that the peƟƟoner would be contended and saƟsfied if he is permiƩed to file a fresh representaƟon before the Senior Superintendent of Police within 15 days and the concerned officer is directed to decide the same in a Ɵme bound manner and he be also permiƩed to raise all the points which he has raised in the present peƟƟon.

3.

NoƟce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

4.

State counsel submits that they would take decision on the fresh representaƟon, if any filed.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.23 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 32723 of 2024 5.

In view of prayer made by counsel for the peƟƟoner, he is permiƩed to file fresh representaƟon before the Senior Superintendent of Police within 15 days menƟoning his e-mail ID as well as of his counsel and the Senior Superintendent of Police is directed to decide the same, if filed either himself/herself or by delegaƟng the same to any officer not below the rank of PPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the peƟƟoner as well as his counsel on the e-mail ID provided on the representaƟon. It is clarified that challan in the FIR capƟoned above shall not be filed Ɵll the decision of the representaƟon.

6.

There would be no need for a cerƟfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the PeƟƟoner and State can download this order and other relevant parƟculars from the official web page of this court and aƩest it to be a true copy. 7.

PeƟƟon is disposed of with the observaƟons menƟoned above. All pending applicaƟons, if any, stand disposed.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 22.10.2024 JyoƟ Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2024.10.23 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh