High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/21744/2016disposed of

Shiv Singh & ORS v. State Of Punjab & ORS

2016-10-20Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.21744 of 2016 Date of decision: 20.10.2016 Shiv Singh and others ..Petitioners

Versus

The State of Punjab and others ..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. H.P.S. Aulakh, Advocate for the petitioners.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is that they have not been regularized in spite of having more than 27 years of service. Earlier the services of the petitioners were terminated but they were reinstated with continuity in service vide award dated 28.05.1992 passed by Labour Court at Gurdaspur Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is covered under the policy of regularization framed by the State Government (Annexure P-1 and P-2). Learned counsel also submits that the petitioners have served a legal notice through their counsel and have also made a representation dated 02.08.2016 (Annexure P-5) but no action has been taken so far. The petitioners would be satisfied in case, directions are issued by this Court to respondent No.1 to consider the representation (Annexure P-5) in view of policy of regularization (Annexures P-1 and P-2). Keeping in view the limited prayer of the petitioners and Neetu Rani 2016.10.24 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.21744 of 2016 without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the case of the petitioners in view of instructions dated 23.01.2001 and 17.11.2011 (Annexures P-1 and P-2) and pass necessary order in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

In case, the petitioners are found to be entitled for regularization and other consequential benefits, the same be released to them within a period of two months thereafter. In case, the petitioners are still aggrieved in any manner, they are at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy. 20.10.2016 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No Neetu Rani 2016.10.24 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh