Ajay Kumar Sharma v. National Fertilizers Limited And ORS
-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 05.09.2023 Ajay Kumar Sharma ......... Petitioner
Versus
National Fertilizers Limited and others ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :
Mr.Harinder Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Mukul Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent-NFL.
**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) 1.
On 24.08.2023, the following order was passed : "The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking notional seniority as Engineer Mechanical w.e.f 01.07.2002 whereas he has been granted notional seniority w.e.f 01.10.2002.
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that petitioner vide memorandum dated 11.11.2002 was granted notional seniority w.e.f 01.07.2002, however, said seniority was granted on the basis of exam conducted by respondent in terms of inter-office-memo dated 07.07.2002. The petitioner vide memorandum dated 11.11.2002 was promoted to the post of foreman (Mechanical). The petitioner secured his degree of Mechanical Engineering in September 2002. The
-2petitioner on the basis of degree was granted notional seniority w.e.f 01.10.2002 whereas in terms of paragraph 5 of promotion policy dated 17.06.1994 he was entitled to notional seniority w.e.f 01.07.2002.
Para 5 of the promotion policy dated 17.06.1994 reads as:
"Determination of 'cut-off-date'
With the implementation of the above Promotion Policy, the 'cut-off-date' for determining the eligibility will be 30th June of the year and promotions to all posts from Asstt. Engr. Upto Manager will be effective from Ist July of the year or from the date of taking over charge of the promoted post. While doing so, there could be some cases where the employee might not have completed the requisite length of service for being considered for promotion under the said scheme on the new cut off date and fall short of eligibility period. It has been decided that all such officers who were promoted on a date between 2nd July and Ist January, i.e.
upto a maximum period of six months, will be eligible to be considered for promotion by allowing relaxation to experience to the extent of shortfall in the eligibility period and if found suitable, the promotion in such cases, will be made effective only from the date of completion of the requisite eligibility period in the existing scale now prescribed. They will, however, be given notional seniority w.e.f.
-3streamline the 'cut off date' for determining eligibility for future promotions. This will be one time benefit during the entire service period."
From the perusal of aforesaid paragraph, it comes out that said paragraph is applicable to officers holding position of Assistant Engineer at the time of claiming promotion.
On being asked whether the petitioner on 30.06.2002 was holding position of Assistant Engineer Mr. Sharma seeks time to get instructions."
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from petitioner, who is present in Court, on being confronted with the fact that Promotion Policy of 1994 is applicable to Assistant Engineer and admittedly petitioner on the alleged date was neither Assistant Engineer nor having Degree of Engineering, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) 05.09.2023 JUDGE anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No