← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/29817/2025allowed

Manjinder Singh @ Kallu v. State Of Punjab

2025-08-28Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29817-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.08.2025 Manjinder Singh @ Kallu ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present :

Mr. G.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner   

    ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1.

         !"

   #   FIR No.43 dated 10.04.2025 registered under Sections 118(1), 118(2), 115(2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) of BNS, at Police Station Sultanwind, Amritsar, Police Commissionerate Amritsar, District Amritsar  $ %&' & ' (       )* +The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.43 dated 10.04.2025 registered under Sections 118(1), 118(2), 115(2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) of BNS, at Police Station Sultanwind, Amritsar, Police Commissionerate Amritsar, District Amritsar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that it was the complainant party, which had attacked the petitioner and other co-accused and inflicted serious injuries on their person. By referring to the MLR (Annexure P-4), learned counsel submits that even the petitioner had suffered serious injuries on his person including one injury on his head. He further contends that as per the complainant, the petitioner was carrying a datar and had caused an injury on the head as well as the left foot of the complainant. He further contends that in fact, the complainant side is a member of the Kissan Union and by exerting illegal pressure on the police, they managed to get the FIR registered against the petitioner.

However, the version of the petitioner was not seen by the police and no action has been taken against the complainant party in the present case.

On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that the injury suffered by the complainant on right side of his head has been declared to be MOHIT 2025.08.28 19:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-29817-2025 (O&M) -2grievous in nature and the petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail by this Court.

At this stage, without commenting anything on the merit of the case, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation. In the event of arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of arresting/investigating officer subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482 (2) of BNSS. Adjourned to 28.08.2025."

, -   .   *.

    # /   #  

 /    #0 .   /    # 1    .2 . /    .

 -     .  .   / #      /    #0  .    1       ' 3/ /  4 # .    #   #      

  %&' & '  .  . #.   

.          ,5 6(( 7 0/      .                     

  /    #  1     #./       #

  ..

(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 28.08.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes / No Whether reportable :

Yes / No MOHIT 2025.08.28 19:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document