Giyano Devi v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2176 of 2016 Date of Order: 06.08.2018 Giyano Devi ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Ors.

....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl.AG, Haryana.

RITU BAHRI, J (ORAL) Pursuant to order dated 14.11.2017 passed by this Court whereby the respondent-State was directed to take into consideration and submit report as to why the petitioner was not entitled for the relief, which was given to the juniors namely Ram Roop, Ratni, Sumitra Devi and Shanti Devi by regularizing their services w.e.f 27.1.1999, an affidavit dated 09.2.2018 of the District Education Officer, Sector 14, Sonepat has been filed along with order dated 08.2.2018 (R.1) whereby the services of the petitioner have been regularized w.e.f 27.1.1999. It is stated in the said order that the benefit from due date are notional and no arrear will be paid. In these circumstances, present petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

August 06, 2018 (RITU BAHRI ) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2018.08.08 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document