← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRWP/8851/2020disposed of

Prachi Boora And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

2020-10-28Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

CRWP-8851 of 2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8851 of 2020 Date of Decision : 28.10.2020 Prachi Boora and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

(Through video conferencing)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

Present:

Mr. Minkal Rawal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

*** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) The petitioners are seeking a direction from this Court to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their life and liberty as they apprehend danger to their life & liberty from respondents Nos.4 and 5 i.e. parents of the petitioner No.1, who are objecting to the marriage solemnized by the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners argues that it is most likely that the private respondents might cause physical harm to the petitioners as they have solemnized the marriage against the wishes of respondent Nos.4 and 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners further argues that both the petitioners are major by age and have solemnized marriage according to the Hindu Rites on 14.09.2020 and they want to live their independent life without any interference from the parents of petitioner No.1 i.e. respondent Nos.4 and 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of this AARTI SHARMA 2020.10.29 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-8851 of 2020 -2Court to the representation dated 23.10.2020 (Annexure P-5) made by the petitioners to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Panipat Sahib seeking protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Haryana, who has joined the proceedings through video conference, keeping in view the service of advance copy of petition, accepts notice on behalf of State of Haryana respondent Nos.1 to 3.

Without making any observation on the merits of the case, especially in respect of the validity of marriage performed by the petitioners, a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to take appropriate decision on the representation, which the petitioners alleged to have made on 23.10.2020 (Annexure P-5), expressing apprehension about danger to their life and liberty at the hands of respondents Nos.4 and 5 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. In case any merit is found in the representation, the appropriate action will be taken by respondent No.2 to ensure that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of the private respondents. It is clarified that this order shall not be treated as an approval of this Court about the marriage of the petitioners and no opinion with regard to the validity of the marriage has been expressed in this order. The writ petition stands disposed of.

October 28, 2020 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti/naresh k.

JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No AARTI SHARMA 2020.10.29 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document