Anil Kumar Sharma And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-16254-2025 Date of Decision: 11.08.2025 ANIL KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS .......PETITONERS

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present:- Mr. P.K. Chugh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.

***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action after giving better particulars as also to explain therein the inordinate delay in filing of this petition.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is clarified that we are not commenting either on the merits or entertainability/maintainability of the petition which may be filed in terms of the liberty sought and got, as above.

[DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] 11.08.2025 JUDGE Prince Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No PRINCE SAINI 2025.08.19 22:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document