← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/14799/2023dismissed

Narinder Sharma v. State Of Punjab And Others

2024-09-17Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal2 pages

CWP-14799-2023 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101-2) CWP-14799-2023 Date of decision:- 17.09.2024 Narinder Sharma

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Narinder Kumar Sharma, petitioner in person. Ms. Amrita Garg, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. B.D.Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ...

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1.

Instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside impugned final report dated 14.05.2022, Annexure P-8, submitted on complaint dated 26.03.2022, Annexure P-7, given by the petitioner against respondent No.4.

2.

Petitioner, who is present in person, has been heard. 3.

A perusal of the impugned final report, Annexure P-8, shows that it was reported that Ranjit Singh has filed a writ petition bearing CWP No.2068 of 2022, and both the parties have agreed that decision of the writ petition will be acceptable to them. On this assurance, the complaint submitted by the petitioner was filed. The writ petition referred to in the report, Annexure P-8, has been withdrawn by the petitioner to avail the alternate statutory remedy. PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.09.18 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CWP-14799-2023 -24.

At this stage, petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy available to him in accordance with law.

5.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 17.09.2024 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.09.18 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.