High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/16708/2018dismissed

Nirmal Singh v. Sgpc

2018-08-16Mr. Justice Rameshwar Singh Malik2 pages

CWP No.16708 OF 2018 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16708 OF 2018 DECIDED ON: AUGUST 16, 2018 NIRMAL SINGH .....PETITIONER..

VERSUS

SHIROMANI GURDWARA .....RESPONDENT..

PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Ms. Vanita Sapra Kataria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J By virtue of instant petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to pay the retiral dues to him as ordered by Hon'ble President vide letter dated 19.03.2018 (P-6). 2.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though legal notice dated 19.02.2018 (P-4) was duly served upon the respondent but till date no conscious decision has been taken. He further submits that petitioner feels satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondent to decide aforesaid legal notice, within a stipulated period. 3.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner put forth by him in legal notice (P-4) particularly, in the light of SONIKA 2018.08.21 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.16708 OF 2018 --2-- letter dated 19.03.2018 (P-6) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. If, the concerned authority comes to the conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the relief claimed through legal notice, to make the payment within a period of next 30 days. 4.

However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court as well as to have recourse to the other remedies available under law. AUGUST 16, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No SONIKA 2018.08.21 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh