Atul Gupta v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-34391-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-1.9.2022 Atul Gupta ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Luvinder Sofat, DAG, Punjab, assisted by ASI Gurmail Singh.

Mr. Fatehjeet Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) It has been informed by learned State counsel that in the present case Special Investigating Team (SIT) had been constituted to look into the matter and upon inquiring into the matter, the petitioner has been found innocent and is not sought to be arrested.

In view of the aforestated position, the instant petition filed under provisions of Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. Since, the FIR has not been cancelled so far by the Illaqa Magistrate, therefore, it is directed that in case ever at a later stage, the Investigating Agency seeks to arrest the petitioner upon finding any other PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.09.01 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

( 2 ) CRM-M-34391-2020 (O&M) piece of evidence, the petitioner shall be afforded 1 week's prior notice before effecting his arrest.

1.9.2022 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2022.09.01 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document