Manoj Verma v. State Of Haryana And Another










 

 










 

 !"#"$
%

 

&


 $'
( )*






+ ""$ )



( )#,#

- 

 ).

$
$/
$0 )













 #1$/ $#









 

) # $
%
)
#0 $
2 ,#0 34
/5!


$/
#
2 $!0 $
 ) 4
/5!


)
0
1 ""$ )




)
 5 $
2
-0 ) $4
4
 ).

$ 



)
 $"$/ )'"
-"$604
/5!


)
) #1$/ $
 



777


 



&

) . )
"$
0
1 ""$
,$/ )
- !"$
8
) 
"#
)
9, #0"$6


&:
/  /
& 8

&84
) 6"# ) /
,$/ )
- !"$#

;8 
 4
&8 4

<* $
3"!
- "$
0 ''

)4
3$6
="0
33
!$# 9, $"

3
1)! /"$6#
* $ "$6
0 ) )*4
$
0
> #"#

!*1)*"# 4
$$ ?,)
@
/  /

 ;





)$ /
!,$# 3
!$ $/#
0 

* ))"

6

) #1$/ $

= #
#3 *$"B /
="0
0
1 ""$ )
$
&&&&

&

,

0"#
= /3!C4

) #1$/ $

6 5
>")0


/ /
!0"3/

= 5 )4
/,

/" ) $! #

$/
/"#1, #
> = $
) #1$/ $
 4
1 ""$ )
$/
0"#
*0 )4
* )"*$"

3
/"#1,
)#
) #,3"$6
"$
) 6"#) "$

0
) * $"$ /



= 5 )4
$=
="0
0
"$ )5 $"$

) #1 ! >3
1 )#$#

#!" .
$/
) 3 "5 #

>0
#"/ #4
/"#1,
> = $
0
1 ""$ )
$/

!*13 "$ $
" 
) #1$/ $

0 #
> $
*"!

>3.
) #35 /
>.
= .


!*1)*"#
$$ ?,)

/  /

 ;

4
$/
0
1 )" #
0 5
3#
"3 /

1 ""$
,@#
&4
"$/,
 ))"

6
!4
&;
"$
=0"!0
#  * $#

)" #
"$
0
")#
*"$
# 6
0 5
> $
) !)/ /



("/
)/ )
/  /
&&& 

4
0
1 )" #
= )
/") ! /

1,
"$
) $!

> )
0
!$! )$ /

@
33
 6"#) 
@
)"

3
,)
$
&& &

&
)
$.
0 )
/ 
0 )  )
!$5 $" $

0
,)
)
) !)/"$6

#  * $#
9,
0
6 $,"$ $ ##

0
!*1)*"#
$/

0
# *
$
> "$6
0
) #,3

$.
,$/,
"$3, $!
)
1) ##,)
)
! )!"$

$.
C"$/
!

$
1,)#, $!
0 ) 4
) 1)
0 #
> $
) ! "5 /
)*
0
)$ /
,/"!"

3
 6"#)  4
0 ''

)

* $"$"$6
0 ) "$

0"#
0 5"$6
) !)/ /
0
#  * $

0
1 ""$ )
#
= 33
#
!*13 "$ $
@
) #1$/ $


0 ")
0 5"$6
))"5 /


!*1)*"#
="0,
$.
 )4

6) /
$/
1) ##,)
$/
,

0 ")
=$
)
="33
$/
0 
 )*#
$/
!$/""$#

0
!*1)*"#
/  /

 ;

0 /
> $
,3"33 /4
0 )
= #
$
!)"*"$ 3
!

#
1 $/"$6
> = $
0
1 )" #
?! 1
0
1) # $
!

# 4
$)
$.
1)!3 * "$
1)! /"$6#
= )
1 $/"$6

$/
"$
5" =
0 ) 4
0
)$ /
,/"!"

3
 6"#)  4
&#
3 ##4
0 ''

)
= #

0
5" =
0 
!*1)*"#
/  /

 ;

= #
6 $,"$
$/
0 /
> $
) 3.
$ ) /
"$
> = $
0
!*13 "$ $

" 
) #1$/ $

$/
1 ""$ )
0 ) "$
="0,
$.
,$/,
"$3, $!
$/
! )!"$
)
1) ##,)


$.
C"$/
$/

33
 )*#
$/
!$/""$#

0
!*1)*"#

0 /
> $
!*13" /
="0







)$ /

#
= 33
#
3 )$ /
!,$# 3
)
) #1$/ $


/*"
0
*"!

>3
# 3 * $

0
/"#1, 4
? !,"$


"/ 5"
@
!*1)*"# 4
$$ ?,)

/  /

 ;

$/
1) .
0 
"$
5" =

#  * $
>.
0
1 )" #
> )
0
3 )$ /
,/"!"

3
 6"#)  4
&#
3 ##4
0 ''

)
$
&& &

&

0
/"#1,
0 5"$6
> $
*"!

>3.
# 3 /
#
= 33

#
= 33
# 3 /
3 =4
0
) * $"$ /

#
= 33
#
33
!$# 9, $"

3
!)"*"$ 3
1)! /"$6#

"$
) #1 !
0 ) 
>
9, #0 /


)$ /
,$# 3
0 5
)  )) /

0
/ !"#"$

$D>3
0
-,1) *
,)
"$

  

 





 
!

 "

#

# #  

 $%

  

 & ''' #
= 33
#
$D>3
,33
 $!0

0"#
,)
"$
( ) 

# #  

 

* 

 &   3 5 $
?) !

0
) * $"$ /
/ !"#"$D#
"#
) 1)/,! /
#
,$/ )
%
+, -    -# 
.#-# #/ 0* 
               



          

   

                  

              

                  !"#   $

               %                    

     &'()      ()      

% $

          

           $ $ 

%          

                    

   

     

   %

  $ *     *     



  





 %  $ 

      

 

 %     +  *

*   %*  $ 

     %          ,

%

       $  



      



            %$  

%*

%        

                + -     

   .       

  %   

   +       % '

   

%      

        $ /   

       %

  0

%     

          * 



%   

     

  * 

 *  

* * 

     +

      

  

 %

   %* $  

%          %      

 



  

         $

    %   *   

%   

     *            

   *   %         

  +

     

        

 



    

 %     

  

       

          $

   *             

%           

         

    

               

           

    

       *       

   

 

 

      ()  

*             

  $1 +, -    -# !

 "

#.#-# #/ "10. In State of Karnataka v. L. Muniswamy & Ors. [(1977) 2 SCC 699], considering the scope of inherent power of quashing under Section 482, this Court held that in the exercise of this wholesome power, the High Court is entitled to quash proceedings if it comes to the conclusion that ends of justice so require. It was observed that in a criminal case, the veiled object behind a lame prosecution, the very nature of the material on which the structure of the prosecution rests and the like would justify the High Court in quashing the proceeding in the interest of justice and that the ends of justice are higher than the ends of mere law though justice had got to be administered according to

laws made by the legislature. This Court said that the compelling necessity for making these observations is that without a proper realisation of the object and purpose of the provision which seeks to save the inherent powers of the High Court to do justice between the State and its subjects, it would be impossible to appreciate the width and contours of that salient jurisdiction. On facts, it was also noticed that there was no reasonable likelihood of the accused being convicted of the offence. What would happen to the trial of the case where the wife does not support the imputations made in the FIR of the type in question. As earlier noticed, now she has filed an affidavit that the FIR was registered at her instance due to temperamental differences and implied imputations. There may be many reasons for not supporting the imputations.

It may be either for the reason that she has resolved disputed with her husband and his other family members and as a result thereof she has again started living with her husband with whom she earlier had differences or she has willingly parted company and is living happily on her own or has married someone else on earlier marriage having been dissolved by divorce on consent of parties or fails to support the prosecution on some other similar grounds. In such eventuality, there would almost be no chance of conviction.

exercise power of quashing on the ground that it would be permitting the parties to compound noncompoundable offences. Answer clearly has to be in 'negative'. It would, however, be a different matter if the High Court on facts declines the prayer for quashing for any valid reasons including lack of bonafides.

11. In Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia & Ors. v.

Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre & Ors. [(1998) 1 SCC 692], it was held that while exercising inherent power of quashing under Section 482, it is for the High Court to take into consideration any special features which appear in a particular case to consider whether it is expedient and in the interest of justice to permit a prosecution to continue. Where, in the opinion of the Court, chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, the court may, while taking into consideration the special facts of a case, also quash the proceedings. 

12. The special features in such matrimonial matters are evident. It becomes the duty of the Court to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes.

13. The observations made by the Court, though in a slightly different context, in G.V. Rao v. L.H.V. Prasad & Ors. [(2000) 3 SCC 693] are very apt for

determining the approach required to be kept in view in matrimonial dispute by the courts, it was said that there has been an outburst of matrimonial disputes in recent times. Marriage is a sacred ceremony the main purpose of which is to enable the young couple to settle down in life and live peacefully. But little matrimonial skirmishes suddenly erupt which often assume serious proportions resulting in commission of heinous crimes in which elders of the family are also involved with the result that those who could have counselled and brought about rapprochement are rendered helpless on their being arrayed as accused in the criminal case. There are many other reasons which need not be mentioned here for not encouraging matrimonial litigation so that the parties may ponder over their defaults and terminate their disputes amicably by mutual agreement instead of fighting it out in a court of law where is takes years and years to conclude and in that process the parties lose their "young" days in chasing their "cases" in different courts.

14. There is no doubt that the object of introducing Chapter XX-A containing Section 498A in the Indian Penal Code was to prevent the torture to a woman by her husband or by relatives of her husband. Sections 498A was added with a view to punishing a husband and his relatives who harass or torture the wife to

coerce her or her relatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. The hyper-technical view would be counterproductive and would act against interests of women and against the object for which this provision was added. There is every likelihood that non-exercise of inherent power to quash the proceedings to meet the ends of justice would prevent women from settling earlier. That is not the object of Chapter XX-A of Indian Penal Code." +, -     -#   ( )  .# -#  #/ 1!2$
   *     %*      

 %

  %  $    

       34"   $-$$    

       *   *

  

 %

     *     %  5       5$ 6           

   * 

 0 



 * 

  

   

  

 

 %     %    %               34"    $-$$           *         %             $
  

   

% 

             *  %      

%       

   

            

%         $ 3#$
  %                     %

     $-$$  

                  34"$  * 



     

    

                     

  

      !"#    $-$$*          

 

     $7



0 5
0 )/
3 )$ /
!,$# 3
)
0
1 )" #
$/
6$
0),60
0
) !)/
he law encourages amicable settlement of matrimonial litigation instead of the parties fighting it out in courts for years and in the process losing out on the prime of their youth in chasing their "cases" in different courts. /*" /3.
"$
0
5 $, 3".

!*1)*"#


/"#1, 4
>0
#"/ #
# $/

6 "$
#
0
!*1)*"#
$
$3.
>)"$6#
1 !

$/
0 )*$.
> = $
0
1 )" #4
>,
3#
) #) #
) $9,"3".
"$
#!" . Bringing an end to the criminal case would enable the parties to move on and rebuild their life.  #"/ #4
"$
0
 !#
$/
!")!,*# $! #

0
!

# 4 ultimate chances of a conviction are bleak. Therefore, no useful purpose will be served by allowing the criminal prosecution to continue. In the light of the position noted above and     *
*

0
!$#"/ ) /
5" =
0 
0 )
"#
$
"*1 /"* $
"$
0
= .

0"#
,)
"$
? )!"#"$6
"#
"$0 ) $
1= )#
,$/ )
- !"$
8
) 

9, #0
0

$/
33
!$# 9, $"

3
1)! /"$6#
* $ "$6
0 ) )*
#
$
,# ,3
1,)1#
=,3/
>
# )5 /


:


!!)/"$63.4
"$
0
3"60

1#""$
$ /
>5 4
0
"$# $
1 ""$
"#
33= /

&:
/  /
& 8

&84
) 6"# ) /
,$/ )
- !"$

;8
 4
&8 4

<* $
3"!
- "$
0 ''

)4
3$6
="0
33
!$# 9, $"

3
1)! /"$6#
* $ "$6
0 ) )*4
$
0
> #"#

!*1)*"# 4
$$ ?,)
@
/  /

 ;

"#
9, #0 /
9,
0
1 ""$ )

)" #
)
/") ! /

/0 )

0
 )*#
$/
!$/""$#

0
!*1)*"# 4
$$ ?,)

/  /

 ;



"3,)

/0 )

0
# *
=,3/
$
$3.
) $/ )
0
/  ,3"$6
1 ).
3"

>3
)
1)! /"$6#
,$/ )
0
$ *1

,)#
!4
&;:&
>,
=,3/
3#
$"3
0

66)" 5 /
1 ).

C
,
11)1)"


1)! /"$6#
"$
) #1 !
0 ) 
"$

!!)/ $!
="0
3 =
8

""$
33= /
"$
0
) * $"$ /
 )*#



 






 )!0

4

&
8

<0 0 )
#1 C"$6@) #$ /
%
 #@

<0 0 )
) 1) >3

%
 #@