Seema Gupta v. Punjabi University & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22126 of 2016 Date of decision: 24.10.2016 Seema Gupta ....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Punjabi University and others

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA

Present:

Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral) Admittedly, as per Annexure P-3, a noting portion, a decision has already been taken which was adverse to the petitioner and the same was to be intimated. Counsel does not deny the fact that it has been intimated to the petitioner. No challenge has been raised to the said decision.

In such circumstances, counsel does not wish to press the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action.

Ordered accordingly.

24.10.2016 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Shivani Gupta 2016.10.24 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh