Raj Kumar And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.08.21 12:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1684-2018 (O&M) 242-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1684-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.08.2019 Raj Kumar and another ... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Mr. Rohit Jindal, Advocate for Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned State Counsel, on instructions, informed that petitioners have been reinstated, subject to final decision in the departmental enquiry.
In view of above, the grievance of petitioners has been redressed, therefore, no cause of action survives in present writ petition and the same is ordered to be disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 19.08.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No