Mohd. Shakeel v. Mohd. Aslam And ORS.

CR-4759-2019 (O&M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.135-1 CR-4759-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.11.2025 MOHD. SHAKEEL ....Petitioner

Versus

MOHD. ASLAM AND OTHERS .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. J.S. Bhatia and Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.1 (sole contesting respondent). ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) Perusal of the order dated 03.11.2025, passed by this Court, reveals that respondent No.1 had brought to the notice of this Court that during the pendency of the execution, while following due process of law, the possession of the demised premises has been obtained by the respondent. On that date, the case was adjourned, as none was present on behalf of the petitioner. Today, counsel for the petitioner has made appearance and he admits about the factual position, with regard to possession of the demised premises having handed over to the respondent, in the due process and as such, the execution has come to an end.

In the given circumstances, it is pertinent to mention that in the present revision petition, vide order dated 11.09.2019, notice of the application for seeking condonation of delay was issued and no notice was Sonu 2025.11.12 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CR-4759-2019 (O&M) issued, with regard to the revision petition and it remained pending, for the aforesaid purpose. The possession of the demised premises has been obtained by the respondent, in due process, which as such, is not disputed. Taking into consideration the affirmatory orders, vis-a-vis, the eviction ordered by learned Rent Controller, which was further affirmed by learned Appellate Authority, it is pertinent to mention that today also, there is nothing evident, to pinpoint about any illegality or irregularity, in the findings so recorded by learned Rent Controller and learned Appellate Authority.

In the given circumstances, the impugned order calls for no interference. Hence, the revision petition is hereby dismissed. (ARCHANA PURI) 11.11.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Vats Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.11.12 09:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document