Poonam Yadav And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 23893 of 2014 Decided on : 20.04.2015 Poonam Yadav and another . . . Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEKHER DHAWAN PRESENT: Mr. S.N. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners states he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition, as the petitioners want to avail the appropriate remedy under the statute.

2.

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedies available to them in accordance with law.

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (SHEKHER DHAWAN) April 20, 2015 JUDGE J.Ram JAWALA RAM 2015.04.20 16:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh