High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/2238/2016disposed of

Sardool Singh v. State Of Haryana & ORS

2016-02-04Ms. Justice Navita Singh,Mr Justice Jaswant Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.2238 of 2016 Date of Decision: February 04, 2016 Sardool Singh ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

--- Present: Mr.Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner. -.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? --- Surya Kant, J. (Oral) The petitioner claims that he is entitled to preferential treatment for the leasing-out Gram Panchayat land to him for the reasons that he has been in cultivating possession of the land since the time of his fore-fathers from the year 1958 to 2014.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Though the Gram Panchayat land can be leasedout strictly in accordance with the rules framed under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 as applicable to the State of Haryana, however, if there is any Government Policy in conformity with the said Act [statedly dated 06.09.2013 (P-7)], we dispose of this writ petition without expressing any views on merits with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with such policy and take an appropriate decision MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.02.08 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.2238 of 2016 [2] within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE February 04, 2016 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE MOHINDER KUMAR 2016.02.08 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh