Satnam Singh Rellay v. State Of Punjab And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.32784 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.07.2024 Satnam Singh Rellay

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and Others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. G.S. Madaan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Swati Batra, DAG, Punjab (Through VC).

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

Seeking direction to the official respondents to take action in accordance with law on complaint dated 25.04.2024 (Annexure P-2) against respondent No.5, petitioner, claiming to be an aggrieved person, has come up before this Court under Section 482 Cr. P.C.

2.

At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be contended and satisfied if his representation which is pending with the official respondent is decided in a time bound manner by passing a speaking order. 3.

Notice served upon the official respondents through the State counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of notices to the private respondents is required. 4.

Let the representation dated 25.04.2024 (Annexure P-2) be decided by Senior Superintendent of Police, NRI, Jalandhar within two months, either herself or by authorizing and delegating it to any officer holding IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representationist(s) without delay.

5.

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to file fresh petition or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law.

Sonia Puri 2024.07.15 20:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-32784-2024 6.

It is clarified that there is no adjudication on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogation of the petitioner is required in any cognizable case.

7.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Petitioner and State can download this order and other relevant particulars from the official web page of this court and attest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use.

Petition is allowed to the extent mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 12.07.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No.

Sonia Puri 2024.07.15 20:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document