Jatinder Pal Singh And Others v. The State Of Punjab And Another
CRM-M-36527-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-36527-2022 (O&M)
Reserved on: 16.09.2022
Date of Pronouncement: 29.09.2022
Jatinder Pal Singh & others
...Petitioner (s)
Versus
The State of Punjab & another
...Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Virat Rana, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Parunjeet Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2.
**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
DDR No. Dated Police Station Sections 8.11.2011 Moti Nagar, District Ludhiana 323, 324, 506, 148 & 149 IPC In FIR No.
Dated Police Station Sections 2.11.2011 Moti Nagar, District Ludhiana 323, 324, 341, 325, 295, 506, 148 & 149 IPC The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the DDR of the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the DDR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.
ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.10.01 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CRM-M-36527-2022 2.
During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3.
After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the DDR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent. 4.
On 24.8.22, the aggrieved person Bhupinder Singh (R-2) appeared before the JMIC, Ludhiana and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this DDR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 7.9.22, the parties consented to the quashing of DDR and consequent proceedings without any threat.
ANALYSIS & REASONING:
5.
However, the petitioners did not arraign the aggrieved/ injured Jaspal Singh and Shammy Sharma as respondents in this case who as per the statement of the concerned court have received injuries 6.
Since all the victims did not state about their no objection to the compromise and also the reasons which led to the compromise, as such this court cannot proceed further in this matter.
7.
Given above, the petition is dismissed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a fresh petition and there would be no necessity re-examine the already examined aggrieved and the accused, whose statements stand recorded. The copies of the statements along with report would suffice. Petition dismissed in the terms mentioned above, with liberty reserved. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE September 29,2022 AK Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes Whether reportable:
No.
ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.10.01 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment