Jagpal And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 18851 of 2017 Decided on : 23.08.2017 Jagmal Singh and another . . . Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL PRESENT: Mr. Anil Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.

**** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) In the writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners pray for declaring the policy of Settlement of Oustees Claims and Conditions thereof dated 11.08.2016 (Annexure P-6) being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and irregular and directly hit by Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. In addition to above, certain other prayers have also been made. 2.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners states that inadvertently certain relevant documents could not be appended and averments in that behalf have also not been made in the present writ petition. Accordingly, a prayer was made that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action by furnishing better particulars and appending relevant documents.

3.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (AMIT RAWAL) August 23, 2017 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jawala Ram 2017.08.25 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh