Bijender Singh v. Sub Divisional Officer Dhbvnl Rohtak And Others

2025:PHHC:075827 [209]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CR-3348-2025 Date of Decision : 10.06.2025 Bijender Singh

...Petitioner

versus Sub Divisional Officer, UHBVNL, Rohtak and others ....Respondents Coram :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR

Present:

Mr. Edward Augustine George, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Vasundhra, Advocate withMr. Asija Bhandari, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

*** ROHIT KAPOOR, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the learned District Judge, Rohtak while dismissing the application filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure vide Order dated 14.05.2025 has wrongly recorded that the counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff was not ready to argue the main appeal. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsels are ad idem that they have no objection, if the Order dated 14.05.2025 is set aside with a direction to the learned District Judge, Rohtak, to decide the appeal in a time bound manner. Without going into the merits of the case, the Order dated 14.05.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Rohtak, is hereby set aside with a direction to the learned District Judge, Rohtak to decide the appeal on or before the date already fixed.

Disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(ROHIT KAPOOR) 10.06.2025 JUDGE 'R. Sharma'

Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.06.10 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document