High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/30879/2019allowed

Sarla Devi And Another v. State Of Haryana

2019-08-08Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

CRM-M No.30879 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.30879 of 2019 Decided on: 08.08.2019 Sarla Devi and another ....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present :

None.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral) Since the Bar is on strike, the Lawyers are abstaining from work and no one is appearing.

Petitioner No.1 prays for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.402 dated 11.06.2019 under Sections 452, 323, 325/34, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Model Town, Rewari, District Rewari. On 22.07.2019, the petition qua petitioner No.2 was dismissed as withdrawn and the interim bail was granted to petitioner No.1 - Sarla Devi as there are no specific allegations against her, causing injury to the complainant.

The operative part of the order dated 22.07.2019, vide which interim anticipatory bail has been granted to petitioner No.1, is reproduced as under:- "....Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that he does not intend to press the present petition qua petitioner No.2 and seeks permission to withdraw the same qua petitioner No.2 Vikas.

MOHD YAKUB 2019.08.08 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M No.30879 of 2019 Petition is dismissed as withdrawn qua petitioner No.2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that petitioner No.1 is lady and against her, there is no specific allegation of causing injuries.

Notice of motion for 08.08.2019...."

Since the Bar is on strike, this petition is allowed and the interim bail granted to petitioner No.1 vide order dated 22.07.2019 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

If, petitioner No.1 is still required for further investigation, she will join the investigation on a notice given by the Investigating Officer.

However, liberty is granted to the complainant to revive the present petition, in case petitioner No.1 is found misusing the concession of bail, in any manner.

(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE 08.08.2019 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2019.08.08 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh