Priya Electronics Th. Its Prop Sanjay Tanwar v. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

CWP 1905 of 2017 Date of decision: 2.2.2017 Priya Electronics through its Proprietor Sanjay Tanwar Petitioner vs.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others Respondent

Present:

Mr. JS Manipur, Advocate.

M.M.S.BEDI,J.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner is that out of two bank guarantees furnished for completion of the work for respondent No.1, second bank guarantee amounting to Rs.5.00 lacs is still lying with the respondents and is not being permitted to be encashed without any reason.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.1 to consider the request of the petitioner (Annexure P-11), which was received in the office on 4.11.2016.

Notice of motion. Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Advocate has accepted notice. Copy supplied. Without expression of any opinion on merits of the case, this petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.1 that the claim of the petitioner for release of second bank guarantee for a sum of Rs.5.00 lacs along with the earnest money would be finally decided by respondent No.1 within a period of two months after the receipt of a certified copy of this order. It will be the responsibility of the petitioner to communicate the order to the concerned authority. February 2, 2017 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Yes/ No Whether reportable Yes/ No Tapinder Singh Mann 2017.02.02 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document