Sunil Kumar @ Bitta v. State Of Punjab And Others
Manoj Kumar 2017.10.13 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19060 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Order: 13.10.2017 Sunil Kumar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Ors.
....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present:
Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raman Singh Dhada, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhaypal Singh Gill, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. J.K. Singla, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 & 4. Mr. Tarun Singla, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 & 6. Mr. Jatinder Singla, Advocate for respondent No.7. RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the impugned letter (Annexure P.3) issued by the SDM, Rampura Phul and the consequential proceedings may be set aside and respondent No.3 may be allowed to hold the elections, in terms of the provisions of the Rules and Regulations.
Disposed of in the above terms.
October 13, 2017 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No