Ramesh Kumar And Another v. State Of Haryana And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-19090-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.01.2023\ RAMESH KUMAR AND ANR ... Petitioners

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocate for Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG Haryana.

**** HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 has since expired and petitioner No.2 has been given the due promotion and thus, the present petition has become infructuous. This factor has not been disputed by the learned State counsel.

Dismissed as having become infructuous.

16.01.2023 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2023.01.17 06:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.