Sunil Dutt Sharma v. State Of Haryana And ANR

CRM-M-33485-2024 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33485-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.08.2025 SUNIL DUTT SHARMA ....Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Rajit, Advocate for respondent No.2.

***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J (ORAL) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 296 dated 07.05.2023 registered under Sections 285, 201, 337 IPC read with Section 27 of Arms Act (Section 307 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act were deleted at the time of filing of challan) at Police Station Ballabhgarh City, Faridabad (Annexure P-1), and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise/affidavit dated 25.04.2024 (Annexure P-2). 2.

This Court vide order dated 03.03.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted MOHIT 2025.08.27 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-33485-2024 (O&M) -2report dated 12.06.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4.

Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 296 dated 07.05.2023 registered under Sections 285, 201, 337 IPC read with Section 27 of Arms Act (Section 307 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act were deleted at the time of filing of challan) at Police Station Ballabhgarh City, Faridabad (Annexure P-1)and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/affidavit dated 25.04.2024 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioner.

7.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly.

(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 25.08.2025 JUDGE Mohit Bishnoi Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MOHIT 2025.08.27 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document