Mam Chand v. Financial Commissioner Revenue Haryana

CWP-15883-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-15883-2024 Date of Decision: 12.07.2024 Mam Chand ....Petitioner

Versus

Financial Commissioner and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present :

Mr. Akshit Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

*** HARSH BUNGER, J. (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for directing respondent No.1 to decide the Revision Petition (along with the application for interim stay) filed by the petitioner in ROR No.274 of 2021. 2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Revision Petition i.e. ROR No. 274/2020-21, titled as "Shyam and another vs. Ronki Ram and others" came to be dismissed in default vide order dated 26.10.2021, passed by learned Financial Commissioner, Haryana and thereafter, the petitioner has filed an application seeking restoration of the same, however, the same is pending consideration till date despite the lapse of more than three years. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that an appropriate direction be issued for the decision of the HIMANI GUPTA 2024.07.15 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh

CWP-15883-2024 -2application seeking restoration of the case, filed by the petitioner in a time bound manner.

3.

Ms. Upasana Dhawan, AAG, Haryana, who has appeared on behalf of respondent/State in this case, pursuant to the advance copy of petition having been sent to her, on instructions of Mr. Gurdeep, Assistant, in the Office of Financial Commissioner Revenue, Haryana, submits that the concerned Officer, who seized of the aforesaid Revision Petition, shall make earnest endeavor for deciding the said petition, within a period of four months from today.

4.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the instant petition any further.

5.

In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the respective counsel, the petition is disposed of, accordingly. 6.

All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 12.07.2024 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2024.07.15 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh