Shiv Kumar Dagar And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ORS
YOGESH SHARMA 2019.07.18 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17509-2018 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17509-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.07.2019 Shiv Kumar Dagar and others ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others ... Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:
Ms. Rinki K. Singhania, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
**** AMIT RAWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that while deciding the representation of the petitioners by passing a speaking order, the claim of the petitioners has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh one by challenging the speaking order, in case, necessity arises. Ordered accordingly ( AMIT RAWAL ) JUDGE 16.07.2019 Yogesh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No