Balihar Singh v. State Of Haryana

205-2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.35148 of 2020 Date of Decision: 26.04.2022 Balihar Singh ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Vishal Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sudhir Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. G. S. Sandhu, Advocate for the complainant.

ANOOP CHITKARA J.

Vide order dated 02.11.2020, the arrest of the petitioner had been stayed.

2.

Given the nature of allegations, no pre-trial incarceration is required. Without commenting on the case's merits and the circumstances peculiar to this case, the petitioner makes a case for release on bail. 3.

Given above, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail subject to his furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. It is further directed that the order dated 19.04.2022 shall be complied with within RITTU 2022.04.28 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M No.35148 of 2020 -210 working days from today. If he fails to comply, it shall be open to the complainant as well as the State to file an application for cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 26.04.2022 rittu Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No RITTU 2022.04.28 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document