Darshan Kumar Ghai v. State Of Punjab & ANR

CWP-23912 -2015 --1--

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23912 -2015 DATE OF DECISION:APRIL 27, 2018 DARSHAN KUMAR GHAI ...PETITIONER VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

Present:

Mr. Swapan Shorey, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurdip Singh, Jr. Assistant, DEO (SE), Gurdaspur along with Mr. TPS Chawla, DAG, Punjab.

***** JASPAL SINGH, J. (ORAL) Through instant petition preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to adopt a uniform and transparent policy to grant re-fixation of pay and increments with retrospective effect as per the directions issued by this Court (P-1) w.e.f. 01.11.1971 and further to refix the salary and pay the arrears.

2.

In response to the notice of motion issued by this Court, the respondents filed reply by way of short affidavit of Mr. Amardeep Singh, District Education Officer (SE) Gurdaspur on behalf of the respondents. 3.

A glance at the aforesaid reply transpires that vide order No.Amla2015 (E-6) 48069-75, dated 25.05.2016 (Annexure R-1/T), the benefit claimed Sonika 2018.05.03 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP-23912 -2015 --2-- through instant petition has been accepted and the benefit accrued on the basis of said order/letter has since been released in favour of the petitioner. 4.

In the light of aforesaid facts and circumstances, the instant petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of, as such. 5.

However, the petitioner is at liberty to have recourse to the remedies, if he still feels aggrieved of the aforesaid order passed by the respondents. APRIL 27, 2018 (JASPAL SINGH) sonika JUDGE whether speaking/reasoned: Yes whether reportable:

Yes/No Sonika 2018.05.03 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh