Saroj And Another v. State Of Haryana Through

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-16359-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 Saroj and Another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and Others

...Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Vikram Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Ms. Anjali, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to pay compensation of ₹50,00,000/- on account of death of their son due to electrocution.

2.

Learned counsel representing respondents No.2 and 3 submits that Competent Authority would consider petitioners' claim as per applicable policy and pass an appropriate order within six weeks from today.

3.

Learned counsel representing the petitioners agrees to the aforesaid statement.

DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.22 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

CWP-16359-2025 (O&M) -24.

In the wake of statements of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 22.05.2026 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.05.22 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment