Udai Singh v. State Of Haryana & ORS

 
    

 

!"#"$%

& & '



 

 








 

(% )* (& +
 ( +*

 


   
!"





  
#
 #
!

!

$
 
%&
 '
!"


 
( )
 

 
"  " ( +*, & -.

/0 *

+


 

 



 
! "

,,-


. 

/



'







"



  )

 "



  

#
 #




,

+


 
 
   #



*, ,0**
 




" "
!  
 .


2
"





 2



,, ,0**

+
 

2
 "

 

% 3
,0**
 
 
( )
2


"





   

 
"





 
&# 




 

 " 
#
#'

 
( )


2



"



+ 
2
2
" "  

#'




 

)


%&
 '

 
"


 
( )
2 

 

 
"  "


#
 #
!

!

$

&# 


2
 

""

  )
2


&


#
#  




 


2


"



/
 

# 

  

 " -


+


"



5 
2
#

,0**



"


"

6 

 

#& 3
,0**


"



2'
2  

" "
! 
 
 .

#




&


#



!

%
& "

 #
.


 

    


 






 #

%" "


&
8  

. 2
&

2
2




 &
 #



   



"



  
  

  
9
 

 
9  "

/
2 
 

 


 
" :



&  
9  "


6"
"


+


 "




6#  




            

 



      

   

         

 

   

  !  "#$

!    

                



%      

 

    

 

 %  $

   

%    

  !  "#$

! 

   &  



                 

   

 

%  $   '

(  )  



  *         %

    + ,

 "-"+  '

( .  



 

/         

 

%          

  ! "#  0  

  

 

    

          

      '

 1  2    



 %(      %  

 

          &     3       

      

    

  

            

    

&

 

 

     4    %  &

 

 

    

 5 8.

In the case in hand, respondent No.4 joined service in 2011. A period of 14 years from her joining has passed away. She must have gained rich experience. Rejection of her selection, at this stage, would neither be in the interest of public nor official respondents. The afore-

cited judgment of Supreme Court is squarely applicable to the instant matter.

9.

In the wake of above discussion and findings, this Court is of the considered opinion that instant petition deserves to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed.

0) ,0,4
%!$ !(
!(!;

 







%<$=

>


  ? '


@ 

>


  &