← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaFAO/4050/2010allowed

Krishna Devi And ORS. v. Satbir And ANR.

2025-10-31Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma15 pages

 

  

    

  

 

!" "

#$

%

&''

( " " ) * +

 *"

"",,--#$ +. *  "

"",

$ /

 01 /*"

*  *

*/  

        

    

   

*

*/

"

!

 

"  #  $  % %& %%'

 "(     )  ! "*

 +  , ! "*-.

     *

 && 

  '//     #     *  0 1/1%23 # $

 0 15  * * 

 6*



*   * %' % %%/  

*   

 

   7**  $ "(  ! "*     

 7*   " *

   " (

*/ ** * 

1   *1 





*

!

 *   3   *  "(  ! "*

$ 

   "   !



(    " $ *  "     $  *     ! "*



 # (  :  

  ! "*

 

  *    ** 

  (     *  

$  ( #*  $

# ( "  *    "(  ! "*

# ( " # !



(     &

:



  *   * $  

 $

"   *

1 13

/ *

-"

* )*

 Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another 45!6 *.,8  .$ #  9  $ $       *3 ;30 

   

      

   

         

  

  

     

 

 



  

  

  

        



    !"#$      

 %#  !"&$

(       

 &'       !"($              

 

 31)

      

                     *               (+,  

       







      

-  

   

 

             

         

    $     

       .   /

    

   

         

                 *  

 

             



  

            32 

     

            (+,           

           (+,    

                 



  

     

                                      

 

              * * * * * * 42.)     

    

       &$        

          0

   1      $     

 !2    !(%+ %! %(

$ 

    



3!4%'#+

3!'#!#(

3!( #'&+

3!&&!&(

 3!# &'(+

  

    

 3!!(!((

35(''+

34'!'(

 3(''4+

 / -"

* )*

 National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. 45 :6 * 7;9

   $ *

  && &83 &/ 

  '// $ # 3 +.

<*   # =    *  > +?.

 *    # # > +).

#  "  ( # *  >

 +<.

"  #*  

 (     * * = $

 > +@.

A**    #     # $



"> 3(   = (

!

 

*#

* *3 ;52. 6  conventional heads 

    

   

 7/

8  *        7 %(+++     



7 !+++++ 

   7

!+++++ 

  

  

     

    

 

   7/

  0      

  

     

  

              



   

   

  



         

     : 

     

            

  6        

            

     



 

    

   

  

  

   

  ; 

       

       

  

 

7   

      

 

  



                    

      

  

  * 

           

 

         

  

  

   

 

    

 7 !(+++ &++++ 7 !(+++

            

   <      

   

  )        

     

 

 

  

  

  

 !+,   

)  

  



  

 



   = = = = = 59.3)   

  (+,    





 



 /      &+

   

   #+,  



 

 &+    (+ 

  * 

   

  

 

 (+'+

   

: !(,6         

 59.4* 







 $       &+,

 

  

  

 &+

6  %(,

  

 &+(+

 !+,

  

 (+'+



 

  

   

   

     

 59.5  .             

       

  

       #+#%0 > ?    

     59.6.

            0> @ &% /

 59.7  

         59.87   

        

 



 

     

    7  !(+++  7  &++++     7  !(+++

  

    

  !+,  

A

; '

-"

* )*

 /#<8# #-

.#&  8,#= 1'8'$

+"

#.

#8 #-'# >.>.

#8 ?

$> 4 ;5 ;6 * (9    #

*#-# +8# 5.,#6 ##= *$>'

5*.,#6

 $ # #  *

    * *3 B216  <

  C  0 8        

     

;



 



  *  

D  D 

      



 D  

 D  D    D     D

 D    

          

  

   

 

  

    )  

      

       

  

 

 %!!Spousal consortium 

   

         

    



      

  

    /  D %!%Parental consortium     

  

D  

   

     

   

     D

! %!# Filial consortium    

  

 

  

6 

      

          

  

   



   

        

                 

    22  



 

     

                   3   /       

 

   E  



 

       

      

              3 /                

   

    

                   

 

  

   

  

  23 3> 

6  

    

     

  

  

  

* 

  

          

     

 

      C  

   

   

   

    6 6   

 

      

    

  

 

           

   

  24         

         

              

   

   D

  D

  C  0 8*  





     

   7 &++++ 



  %  * $   3 6* $   " 8/ ( #     $  *(   * #  $  "  ! "* B (    +@= 39.

   #  $ 9% ( :

  $

 "( -"

* )*

Sunita Vs. Vinod Singh 2025 INSC 366 $  -" = )*

 

"  

  #  ( 



"

  #      !

 = 

* *3 B!!     

 

  7 (2!5" 7

.    -    F

$     !++++" 7

   $   

           



  

 

 

  



7 (!#4" 7

.    ;

    $     

 

      

       

           %(++" 7

  .   $   



7 4'#4" 7

  0     $     7 4+++" 7

0

  $                  

        

  &(

   C 3

7   

 

 



  



  

     



             !  #+

 

!(

 

             

       

   

  

  



 %(#+

      !54+  Moreover, in the absence of material indicating to the contrary, there is no inhibition to accept the age of the deceased as per the Post2Mortem

  Report       



 !&    &(

)  

  

 C  0  $ 

&++++"  7

 .    $        

 !+, 



 

  

    3 G

* 

HF 7  %+!2$!20!#+ 

                         I7 &2+++"    (J  

7 %&++++" 7

H   .   $      



 

 A :  $ "  

*# #   6*

# (    =#     "(  ! "* :

*(    $  C3  

 (   00'923  

  @= 3 +(   .

 * @= 3 +(   .

$  # (  $  00'923  

"*  *  *

 ( $

# $  $ # #  0%%%23   !

! "*

  (

 (   0%%%23   $

 * #  !

D ! "*



 #  ( ( 

  $  $ 7*  * "   "  (   # * (  **  * "   

 (

 -"

* )*

  

Meenakshi v. Oriental Insurance Company, 2024 INSC 583 *   

 !

 = 

* *3 !+   

 

    

                    

    

     

     

  6

 

 

/     

  



    (+,

 



  

    

       !!      

 

          

    F  !  * 

      

        ₹ !+&+!+++" 7

;

      $ 

6

 

 ₹ &5(4+#(" 7

.   

    

  $ !%)          

 

     

        

       

      

  



)7*(

 $ (    @= 3

*# -" = )*

 Meenakshi Vs. Oriental Insurance

  Company's case $ !

 ( ( 

  00'923  

 *  

  ! "* 

$

( # *  

 1

 $ $  $ "( -"

* )*

Sarla Verma's case (supra). !

D ! "*   $ ( *  **     * $  * =   *

$    "   !

 $ 7* 

*#

)*  1*

& :  $ $  $ "( -"

* )*

"  

*#  

$ !

$  % %& %%'

    #( !

3          *  

*3 Sr. No.

Heads Compensation Awarded  ( :  00'923 A**  8%5  88/23 +8%5 00'9.

<* $  = *

 18823 + % 8 29.

! :

 01''23 + % 83188.

*  

& * <(

 8&0/%23 +011'

1.

D @  / 1%23 / A* @=  / 1%23 '

D ) * +9/9%% 9.

 '8&%%23 %

$#-  8,#$'

" 2!:2:@  .&$'

* $ "( ! "* ":2 2;@ >#&

#8 .$ ";2; 2;:@ 5 2!:2::2 2;6

 



 



 "( -"

* )*

Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara Vs. Shyam Singh Varma  !

 ( :7 R.Valli and Others VS. Tamil Nandu State Transport Corporation (2022) 5 Supreme Court Cases 107 3   #

 '5  *   *    #     

  F / !

:* )(3

     *  # $

 $

! "* $

  $     (

*# !

! "*

  "*   *  # $



*  2    "(  ! "*  

 $  % %& %%'

!

 2    *

" *    ! "* ( " "

5*

*/6 

 )   " K L

)  

K L