Yograj Singla v. State Of Punjab And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30539-2025 Date of Decision: 01.07.2025 Yograj Singla

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate and Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Navreet K. Barnala, A.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 30.03.2025 Gobindgarh Mandi, District Fatehgarh Sahib 406, 420 IPC 1.

Seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 by the trial Court, the petitioner has come up before this Court under Section 483(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS].

2.

Counsel for the petitioner seeks cancellation of bail on the ground that no recovery has been effected.

3.

It is needless to say that bail cannot be cancelled on the ground that no recovery was effected. It is for the Investigator to ensure that entire proceeds of crime are recovered. In case, the account has not been frozen, the Investigator may do so if he think it proper. There is no need to issue notice to private respondent because it is the primary duty of the Investigator to recover proceeds of crime. 4.

Given the above Observation, counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh cancellation of bail before the trial Court in case proceeds of crime are not recovered.

5.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. All pending applications, if any also stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 01.07.2025 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2025.07.03 12:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh