High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/1959/2017disposed of

Mashinder Kaur Gill v. State Of Punjab & Others

2017-02-03Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP-1959-2017 Date of decision: 03.02.2017 Mashinder Kaur Gill

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab & others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) The instant writ petition has been filed seeking a writ, direction or order in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the petitioner benefit of proficiency step up on completion of 8, 16 & 24 years service under ACP Scheme dated 25.09.1998 (Annexure P-1) and revised pay and pension from the due date along with consequential benefits with interest.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was appointed as JBT Teacher on ad hoc basis on 29.10.1968 and his services were regularized on 01.04.1977 in Education Department, Punjab and retired from service on 24.08.2001. She worked on the same post throughout in the same pay scale. She was not granted ACP benefit on completion of 8, 16 and 24 years service. The legal notice (Annexure P-2) has already been served upon the respondents on 15.05.2015 and to date the same is yet pending consideration.

Notice of motion.

Satyawan 2017.02.06 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CWP-1959-2017 -2Mr. Rupam Aggarwal, learned DAG, Punjab, who is present in the Court is directed to accept notice on behalf of the respondents. Let three copies of the paper book be handed over to him by the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day.

In view of the limited prayer made herein, the respondents are directed to decide the legal notice (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioner is found to be entitled to the necessary relief as sought for, the necessary benefit be granted to her within a period of three months thereafter.

03.02.2017 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2017.02.06 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh